Violence in Canadian and Ameri apprize television unneurotic Ameri set ups and Canadians involution against the standard of force play depicted on television receiver. It is unfortunately a growing concern for two(prenominal) countries. More abandon is represent on the Statesn programs; consequently, those programs argon the cardinals that make it on to Canadian television. Evidently it is not plainly a concern for one country instead an t solelyy concern for both(prenominal)(prenominal). Violence can be defined as the explicit act of drag destined to persecute or kill, or the expression of what constantly serious threat to injure or kill a character, whether human or humanlike. This explanation of craze is readily seen on television, on a miscellany of programs such as situational comedy, bid series, cartoons, childrens shows, crime shows and sketch comedy. The equivalence of Canadian and American rage illust orders that they both enlighten the resemb ling affects on viewing audience; however, the terminations of criminal activity nuclear number 18 a lot high in the U.S. The resulting acts of force coincide with the distinguishable justices pertaining to flatulence fit in both countries. The comparison of emphasis on American and Canadian television has umpteen similarities such as the instaluation of the V-Chip, and the ca expenditure of watching emphasis. However, the differences between the countries be appargonnt when it comes to wedge simplicity and the laws that apply. Canadian and American programs be precise unalike. The carriage they depict gists is alone different, Canada seems to be much more(prenominal) blimpish where as the U.S is more daring. heedless of whether Canadian programs are different, Canadians comfort are highly overt to American television. Evidently in that respect are much more American networks than Canadian, possibly beca determination of their high population. The bosom of violence in U.S programs is 23.4 %! more than on Canadian programs (fraserinstitute.ca). It can be implied that the majority of the viewers actu eachy sleep with watching brag programs, since the rates on hazardous shows remain high. For exercise in American sketch comedy violence seems to be portrayed as a joke, and the issue is not taken rattling seriously. Subsequently, in Canadian sketch comedy it is nigh the opposite, rarely is on that point a violent come outbreak, instead violence is merely talked or so not acted out. However, the comedy programs that get high ratings are the American programs, not Canadian. This shows that violence portrayed in programs re everyy increase ratings, and unfortunately many viewers pose it to their delight. Although depictions of violence may get high ratings it effects bulk of all ages, and is especially detrimental to children. The behavioural outcomes remain the same for both America and Canada; however, the numbers of affected slew are greater in the U.S. S ome of the affects of violence portrayed in television are visualizeing to dissemble violently, desensitization to violence, and stately of being attacked (media-awareness.ca). In a field of study violence ascertain that was conducted in America it was found that 73% of perpetrators go undisciplined in violent scenes, which makes viewers more likely to learn that violence is sure-fire (media-awareness.ca) This negative effect of viewing violence especially affects children. Children who consistently view violence are more likely to be shake off the same way. An another(prenominal) important event found from the National Television Violence Study was 25% of violent interaction on T.V involves side arms (media-awareness.ca). This could be the source that the joined States has the highest homicide rate among school-aged children, nearly 5,300 died as a result of piece of musics in 1995 (asbj.com). In 1996 it was found that hand submarine sandwichs were used to murder 106 people in Canada and 9,266 in America. This staggerin! g difference is possibly the result of the futile torpedo regulations that the U.S has. The reason that hand ordnance stores are out of suss out in the U.S could be due to the second amendment in the pecker of Rights recognizing the remedy to keep and bear arms. This could very well be the reason why the U.S has the weakest gun regulations, and the highest gun violence than all other countries. The only law Americans overhear regarding gun mark off is the Brady law. This law was implemented in 1993 and requires a play down incumbrance be done, and a flipper twenty-four hours time lag catch before you get to keep the gun. However, in 1998 the five day background defend was replaced by a mandatary, computerized national check strategy. This system only takes a a few(prenominal) legal proceeding to do a background check on spell purchases. Consequently, the performance to buy a gun only takes a few minutes. This fast and easy way to buy a gun explains the high rate of violence in America. In Canada, the come up of deaths due to handguns is low in comparison to the U.S. The laws pertaining to firearms are very different in Canada. In 1995, premier(a) Minister dungaree Chretian demanded and got the Firearms Act, a national system of firearm registration and licensing. Since celestial latitude 1, 1998 the Canadian Firearms Act of 1995 went into estimable effect, and Canadians are now getful to register their firearms no by and by then January 2003. The Firearms Act requires that in order to purchase a gun a possession and acquisition license is mandatory (usgovinfo.abou.com). In Canada the possession of handguns is curtail to collectors, target shooters and those who demonstrate the need of guns to protect their live. The U.S has not such restriction. Another very different component Canada is the Firearms Act requires a safety course be taken. In order to feature or buy a rifle, shotgun or handgun the safety course must be acc omplished. The limitations and laws regarding gun con! trol in Canada are very distinctive compared to the U.S. The high intensity level of gun violence in the states correlates to its weak gun regulations. This in turn reflects the sum up of violence that is portrayed on American programs. It would be blind drunk not to include what American and Canadian governments are confinement as a result of violence on television.
The U.S and Canada have both recognized the ill affects of violence on television. Similarly, both countries have mandated the innovative V-Chip technology. The V-chip allows parents to monitor what children are watching by controlling the television programs they view. An American choose that was conducted by Kaiser Family mental hospital in 1999 found that 77% of parents would use the V-Chip if they had one (usinfo.state.gov). The performance of the V-chip would be effective since more than half of the parents in the U.S would use it. Parents are obviously concerned about what their children are clear to, and this is an effective way of filtering violent programs. Canada and U.S have similar rating systems, they determine what types of programs are suitable for children, and what are not. This is helpful since many American programs are shown in Canada. both(prenominal) countries hope to have the smart V-Chip technology installed in all new television sets. The effect of violence on television cannot be ignored and is an issue that the U.S and Canada have to deal with. The amount of violence that is portrayed on American shows is farthermost greater than on Canadian shows, but many of the American programs are viewed by Ca nadians. Therefore both countries have to deal with t! he unspeakable affects that it has especially on children. The psychological affects can lead to violent outbreaks, especially with handguns. American gun violence is extremely high, principally because of its exceptionally weak gun regulations. On the contrary Canada has late applied the strict Canadian Firearms Act to regulate gun control. The Canadian law pertaining to guns seems to be more effective since the amount of gun violence is far less. This issue cannot be dealt with lightly, and in turn both countries have implemented a system in hope of filtering out violent programs. The portrayal of violence is highly unlikely to ever be eliminated; however, it can be now be monitored with the V-Chip. It result be a go on struggle to decrease violence in both countries scarcely at least(prenominal) the governments have started to deal with the issue. Work Cited 1. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the military personnel wide weathervane celestial latitude 2, 2001. http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/publications/onbalance/1998/february/news.html 2. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the founding Wide blade December 2, 2001. www.media-awareness.ca/eng/med/home/resources/ntvs.htm 3. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001. www.asbj.com/ protection/contents/0399hayneschalker.html 4. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001 www.usgov.info.about.com 5. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Retrieved from the World Wide Web December 2, 2001 www.usinfo.state.gov/the States/schools/vchip.htm If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
